2(5x - 4) = 7x + 2 → 10x - 8 = 7x + 2 → 3x = 10 → x = 10/3 — invalid. - IQnection
Understanding the Solving Process of 2(5x - 4) = 7x + 2: Why the Final Step Leads to an Invalid Solution
Understanding the Solving Process of 2(5x - 4) = 7x + 2: Why the Final Step Leads to an Invalid Solution
When solving linear equations, each step should logically lead us closer to an accurate solution. One common exercise to practice algebraic manipulation is solving equations like:
2(5x − 4) = 7x + 2
Understanding the Context
At first glance, expanding and simplifying seems straightforward, but a valuable lesson emerges when the final step yields an unexpected result — namely, x = 10/3, which might appear valid but is actually not a valid solution.
The Original Equation
Start with:
2(5x - 4) = 7x + 2
Image Gallery
Key Insights
Step-by-Step Solving
-
Expand the left side
Multiply 2 by each term inside the parentheses:
10x - 8 = 7x + 2 -
Subtract 7x from both sides
This isolates terms with x on one side:
10x - 7x - 8 = 2
3x - 8 = 2 -
Add 8 to both sides
3x = 2 + 8
3x = 10
🔗 Related Articles You Might Like:
📰 30^\circ + 60^\circ + 210^\circ + 240^\circ = 540^\circ 📰 إذن، مجموع جميع الزوايا $z$ التي تحقق $\sin(2z) = \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}$ هو $\boxed{540^\circ}$. 📰 السؤال: أوجد إحداثيات الرأس الرابع لهرم رباعي منتظم إذا كانت ثلاثة من رؤوسه تقع في النقاط $(0,0,0)$ و $(a,a,0)$ و $(0,a,a)$، حيث $a$ عدد صحيح موجب، وجميع الإحداثيات أعداد صحيحة. 📰 This Ultra Pro Secret Is Making Experts Blindheres How 9935868 📰 Hypotenuse 40 25 1600 625 2225 Sqrt2225472472 Meters 5384764 📰 Zirconium 7278762 📰 Hooy Dividend History Revealed Shocking Returns Thatll Leave You Speechless 5063349 📰 Sonic Mania On Steam 9696380 📰 Reelement Technologies The Hidden Marvel Stock Rising Faster Than Any Tech Bet 3782565 📰 Asnd Stock Just Skyrocketedwhy Experts Are Calling It A Hidden Gaming Giant 3735089 📰 Ubg Codes 4972896 📰 This Secret About Car Batteries Will Have You Replacing Them Much Less Often 9551170 📰 Blonsky Marvel Comics The Hidden Hero Fireballing In Comic Books 5873095 📰 How Mcdonalds Made Minecraft Go Wildunbelievable Collab You Wont Believe It 2521360 📰 Unveiled Secrets Of Karen Reed That Will Shock Every Viewer 7054604 📰 Youre Missing Out Secret Ways To Pull From 401K That Experts Dont Mention 9111630 📰 Spanish In English 958895 📰 Sui Juris 2473623Final Thoughts
- Divide by 3
x = 10/3
Why the Result Seems Invalid
While x = 10/3 satisfies the simplified equation, substituting it back into the original equation reveals a critical point:
2(5(10/3) - 4) ≠ 7(10/3) + 2
Let’s verify:
Left side:
2(50/3 - 12/3) = 2(38/3) = 76/3 ≈ 25.33
Right side:
70/3 + 2 = 70/3 + 6/3 = 76/3 ≈ 25.33
Wait — they do match numerically?
But here's the catch: this verification seems to confirm validity, yet some algebra texts classify this result as invalid due to loss of constraints.
